<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Sociétés plurielles</title>
    <description>Sociétés plurielles: latest publications</description>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>Episciences</generator>
    <link>https://societes-plurielles.episciences.org</link>
    <author>Sociétés plurielles</author>
    <dc:creator>Sociétés plurielles</dc:creator>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://api.episciences.org/api/feed/rss/societes-plurielles"/>
    <atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
    <item>
      <title>When Words Tell Things: A Linguistic Archaeology of the Mother–Child Dyad</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This paper tests the hypothesis that certain sound–meaning patterns associated with “mother” and “breast” may reflect a very ancient codiffusion, inherited from the earliest migrations of Homo sapiens and from the centrality of the mother–infant dyad. Within a framework of “linguistic archaeology,” four phonotactic traits are examined across 2,959 languages (“mother”) and 7,322 languages (“breast”) from the Lexibank and ASJP databases: [n]/[ŋ] and [na]/[ŋa] in initial position for “mother,” and [mu] and [amu] for “breast.” Their distribution is assessed through spatial analyses (Moran’s I, binomial z-scores on 2°×2° grids, random permutations, great-circle distances). The results reveal a non-random structuring for [n]/[ŋ] and [mu], with hotspots in Africa, South Asia, Island Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and Australia, regions that align with the southern routes of early Homo sapiens dispersal. The forms [na] and [amu], more geographically restricted, appear as regional archaisms. The strong geographic co-occurrence between [n]/[na] and [mu], contrasting with the limited spread of [amu], suggests an ancient lexical core linking “mother” and “breast,” not reducible to articulatory biases alone. Without positing a single protolanguage, the study shows that linguistic areology can reveal fossil traces of an early cultural structuring around the mother–infant dyad, providing partial support for the hypothesis of an initial cultural unity disseminated during the first out-of-Africa dispersals of Homo sapiens.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17333</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17333</guid>
      <author>d'Huy, Julien</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[lexical diffusion]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[areology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[human migratory routes]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[phonotactics]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[mother–infant dyad]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[linguistic archaeology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[aréologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[routes migratoires humaines]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[diffusion lexicale]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[phonotactique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[dyade mère-enfant]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[archéologie linguistique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>d'Huy, Julien</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The contribution of social invariants to learning social work: an analysis of first-year students’ perceptions</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This research examines the place and function of sociological knowledge in social work training, particularly through the teaching of social invariants proposed by Bernard Lahire (2023). These concepts, which can shed light on the fundamental structures of society, are studied here in terms of their reception and perceived usefulness by first-year students in the bachelor’s degree program in social work at Hénallux (Namur, Belgium). The study adopts a mixed approach: a questionnaire administered to 77 students, analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests, is supplemented by eight interviews with students and two interviews with teachers, which are subjected to thematic analysis with a double coding cycle. The results highlight three major functions of invariants: (1) deciphering situations involving users, (2) a more complex understanding, and (3) capitalizing on solutions to address the vulnerabilities of the public. In addition, two specific advantages emerge from social invariants: their explanatory power as general concepts that can be used to elucidate social phenomena while promoting, through their contextual variation, a nuanced interpretation of situations encountered in social intervention, and the inter/transdisciplinary scope of invariants. While a minority of students remain skeptical of theoretical knowledge, the relational and pedagogical quality of teaching appears to be a decisive lever for appropriation. Despite some limitations mentioned, the study concludes that invariants are relevant as integrative tools, articulating sociological intelligibility, reflexivity, and professional intervention.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17334</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17334</guid>
      <author>Paglia, Vincent</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[educational relationship]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[social work]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[fundamental structures of human societies]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[social invariants]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[relation pédagogique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[travail social]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[invariants sociaux]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Paglia, Vincent</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exploring age hierarchies in living organisms: Adult dominance among primates</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This article proposes to extend the study of the “hierarchical succession law” proposed by sociologist Bernard Lahire beyond the human species to include non-human primates. It argues for the need to extend the investigation of the nomological architecture defined in Structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines (Fundamental Structures of Human Societies) to other animal species and suggests the use of an “inductive taxonomy” method to identify laws and invariants applicable at different taxonomic levels (species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, and kingdom). Based on a synthesis of the literature in primatology and ethology, this contribution shows that the current state of research suggests that this law of “hierarchical succession” and adult domination are trans-species invariants that apply to all species of the Hominidae family and possibly all those of the primate order (and even mammals). Future research could further explore 1) the study of age-related dominance between juveniles on the one hand and between adults on the other; 2) the distinction between dominance based on age and dominance based on seniority (in a given territory); and 3) the differences between adult dominance and dominance based on seniority (taking into account the dominance experienced by older individuals). Finally, future work on the cultural dimensions and forms of resistance of young primates against adult dominance is also necessary.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17329</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17329</guid>
      <author>Allegret, Gabriel</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[primatology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sociology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[age hierarchy]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[adultism]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[domination by seniority]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[adult domination]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[adultisme]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[domination adulte]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[domination par l’antériorité]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[primatologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sociologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[hiérarchie d’âge]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Allegret, Gabriel</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rubio Clémentine, 2022, L’enseignement du français en Palestine, d’après les archives diplomatiques du Consulat de France à Jérusalem: Éditions Lambert-Lucas, Paris, Limoges, 262 p.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17335</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17335</guid>
      <author>Verdeil, Chantal</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Verdeil, Chantal</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Radler Dana &amp; Toma Cristina-Alice (dir.), 2024, Panait Istrati. Arhiva de la Siguranță / Panaït Istrati. Archive de la Sigourantza (1922-1942): Ediție bilingvă / Édition bilingue, Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, 616 p.</title>
      <description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17336</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17336</guid>
      <author>Crețulescu, Vladimir</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Crețulescu, Vladimir</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The fundamental structures of prehistoric societies</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In Les structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines, Bernard Lahire shows that two biological constraints– sexual procreation and prolonged altriciality–permanently shape human social organisations. They generate relationships of dependence and domination, complemented by social invariants (kinship, division of labour, age hierarchies, cultural transmission) that structure all societies while leaving room for significant cultural variation. For prehistory, this framework provides an essential tool: in the face of incomplete data, it enables us to narrow down our hypotheses and anchor our analyses in the continuities of life. The book also sheds light on the structural origins of male domination, without denying the ability of human societies to modulate or overcome its effects. By offering a “map” of social invariants, Lahire provides major theoretical support for prehistoric research.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17330</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17330</guid>
      <author>Augereau, Anne</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[social invariants]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[cultural variations]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[male domination]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[prehistory]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[biologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[préhistoire]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[domination masculine]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[invariants sociaux]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[variations culturelles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Augereau, Anne</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Biology and humanities: An evolutionary biologist’s perspective on Bernard Lahire’s book</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Bernard Lahire’s book, Les Structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines (2023), is a magnificent plea for transdisciplinarity, an approach that I find absolutely essential to enable all sciences to continue to advance our understanding of the universe around us. That being said, I would like to share a few thoughts that came to mind while reading this magnificent work, in relation to my own approach to synthesis in the field of biology. The first thought I would like to address here is in support of the transdisciplinary approach adopted by Bernard Lahire. Next, I offer two thoughts on the importance of general interdisciplinary laws. My fourth thought follows on from the previous ones and concerns the necessity of developing a common vocabulary to promote synthesis between disciplines. Finally, I make the connection with an important topic in the humanities: the origin of inequalities, a subject that Bernard Lahire naturally addresses in his book. My ultimate goal is to remind readers how closely biology and the humanities are linked, in that they both deal with the understanding of living things, which leads them to share many concepts and principles.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17328</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17328</guid>
      <author>Danchin, Étienne</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[humanities]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[social inequalities]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[historical law]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[natural selection]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[human societies]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[biologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sciences humaines]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[inégalités sociales]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[loi historique universelle]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sélection naturelle]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sociétés humaines]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[évolution]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Danchin, Étienne</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leaving the cave to better return to it: in search of invariants</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Bernard Lahire’s thinking is extremely motivating because it allows us to connect the social with the living, to identify “lines of force” and “laws” that permit the creation of a scientific language that transcends mere descriptions and protects us from general discourses too disconnected from reality. Is it possible to make a considerable leap forward in time and apply these ideas to periods without written records, about which we know practically nothing? This is a new path to explore, and we present here the first, undoubtedly still clumsy, strokes of the pruning knife.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17331</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17331</guid>
      <author>Pigeaud, Romain</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[decorated caves]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[lines of force]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Prehistory]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[grottes ornées]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[épistémologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[lignes de force]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[lois]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[préhistoire]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Pigeaud, Romain</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ambiguïté du rire pour faire une société humaine</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This article explores the ambivalent social functions of laughter through an interdisciplinary approach combining sociology, ethology, anthropology, developmental psychology, and, to some extent, gender studies and technology. It analyzes the evolutionary, normative, critical, and cultural dimensions of human laughter. It thus shows that laughter constitutes a fundamental social practice – at once a vector of inclusion and sanction, and potentially of subversion and relational creativity.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17332</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17332</guid>
      <author>Date, Kiyonobu</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[interculturality]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[posthumanity]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[social exclusion]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Henri Bergson]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sociology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[smile]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[laughter]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[child development]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[exclusion sociale]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Henri Bergson]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sociologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[développement de l’enfant]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[évolution]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sourire]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[rire]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[genre]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[interculturalité]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[posthumanité]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[ポストヒューマン]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[間文化性]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[ジェンダー]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[包摂]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[社会的排除]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[アンリ・ベルクソン]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[社会学]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[子どもの発達]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[進化]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[微笑]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[笑い]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Date, Kiyonobu</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>General laws of evolution and internal laws of evolution within societies: A comparative reading of Bernard Lahire and Alain Testart</title>
      <description><![CDATA[In his book Structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines (Fundamental Structures of Human Societies), Bernard Lahire returns to the original purpose of social sciences: discovering the laws that govern human societies. However, while the founders of social sciences sought above all to identify laws specific to a given type of society, Bernard Lahire prefers to focus on universally valid laws. This article examines the possibility of articulating these two research perspectives. It attempts to understand how the laws of internal evolution within societies relate to the general laws of evolution identified by Bernard Lahire. To this end, it compares the work of Bernard Lahire with that of Alain Testart, one of the most recent authors to have provided the most serious avenues for identifying laws specific to given societies. This dialogue shows that one of the keys to understanding the problem lies in the junction between the law of cumulative objectification (general law) and the laws of concentration of rights over men (which are specific to different types of society).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17327</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17327</guid>
      <author>Aslanoff, Elie</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[accumulation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[evolutionism]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Alain Testart]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Bernard Lahire]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[évolutionnisme]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Bernard Lahire]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Alain Testart]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[accumulation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[richesses]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[lois]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Aslanoff, Elie</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Matter, energy, humanity: Anthropology versus entropy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This article builds on Bernard Lahire’s recent call to refound the social sciences within a unified framework that incorporates the life sciences. This unification is approached from the standpoint of anthropology, defined as a general science of the human species and necessarily grounded in the natural sciences that elucidate the biological, cognitive, and social emergence of Homo sapiens.Drawing on the physics of complex systems, the argument emphasizes that life, as an open system, counteracts entropy by developing complex structures capable of processing information for self-organization—of which human societies constitute the most sophisticated expression to date. The systematic articulation of three levels of reality—matter-energy, information, and reflexivity—demonstrates that human uniqueness stems less from an ontological rupture than from an extreme amplification of the informational capacities inherent in living systems, culminating in scientific reflexivity.Anthropology thus emerges as a pivotal discipline, capable of linking the study of complex social systems with a naturalistic understanding of life, and of providing a conceptual framework for analyzing the interdependencies between the biosphere and the anthroposphere.Bernard Lahire’s proposed “social science of life” gains additional conceptual grounding when viewed through this broader lens: the unification of the social and natural sciences is not merely a programmatic ambition but an existential necessity arising from humanity’s position within the matter-energy-information continuum.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17326</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17326</guid>
      <author>Lelong, Boris</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Anthropology Against Entropy]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Humanity]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Matter]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[l’anthropologie contre l’entropie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[humanité]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[énergie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[matière]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Lelong, Boris</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On the Reversive Effect of Evolution: A Brief Response to Bernard Lahire</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The concept of the reversive effect of evolution, introduced by Patrick Tort into Darwinian studies in 1983, has profoundly unsettled a great many received ideas about Darwin and about his understanding of the civilizing process. In The Descent of Man (1871), Darwin explains with the utmost clarity that, in acting powerfully upon social instincts and rational capacities, natural selection selects civilization—an outcome that stands in opposition to the (now archaic) eliminatory dynamic of natural selection by seeking to transform the human environment into an aid to survival.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 15:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17325</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17325</guid>
      <author>Tort, Patrick</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[reversive effect of evolution]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Wallace (Alfred Russel)]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[natural selection]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Darwin (Charles Robert)]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[civilization]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[darwinian anthropology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Wallace (Alfred Russel)]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sélection naturelle]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[effet réversif de l’évolution]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Darwin (Charles Robert)]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[civilisation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[anthropologie darwinienne]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Tort, Patrick</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pecqueux Anthony, Poupin Perrine et Vuillerod Jean-Baptiste (coord.), « Tracés », hors-série no 22 : « L’interdisciplinarité “en effet” : sciences sociales, sciences naturelles﻿ »</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ce numéro, structuré autour d'une introduction écrite par les coordinateurs du numéro, de cinq articles interdisciplinaires et de deux entretiens, propose une analyse riche et essentielle portant sur l'interdisciplinarité entre les sciences sociales et les sciences naturelles et la manière dont cette interdisciplinarité fait « face à la question écologique ».]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14693</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14693</guid>
      <author>Robert-Boeuf, Camille</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Robert-Boeuf, Camille</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Badrinathan Vasumathi, Pejoska-Bouchereau Frosa, Racine Odile, Szende Thomas (dir.), « Médier entre langues, cultures et identités : enjeux, outils, stratégies. Mediating between languages, cultures, identities: challenges, tools, strategies »: Éditions des archives contemporaines (Coll. Plidam), 2022</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Cet ouvrage propose des approches riches et nuancées de la médiation interculturelle et linguistique. Il met en lumière le rôle fondamental des médiateurs dans notre monde de plus en plus divers et connecté.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14692</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14692</guid>
      <author>Mladenov, Olivera</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Mladenov, Olivera</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>William A. Ewing et Holly Roussel, « Civilization : Quelle époque ! », 2021</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Way We Live Now : tel est le sous-titre original de l’exposition Civilization qui a donné lieu à ce catalogue. L’objectif poursuivi est de rendre visibles les travers majeurs de notre civilisation et notamment l’incapacité de l’humanité à « appuyer sur le frein ».]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14691</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14691</guid>
      <author>Vartejanu-Joubert, Madalina</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Vartejanu-Joubert, Madalina</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vladimir Crețulescu, « Ethnicité aroumaine, nationalité roumaine : la construction discursive d’une identité nationale (1770-1878) »: Paris, L’Harmattan, 2021</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Dans cet ouvrage, Vladimir Crețulescu s’attelle à étudier une des questions centrales du champ des études aroumaines, en rapport avec l’identité nationale des Aroumains.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14690</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14690</guid>
      <author>Pitsos, Nicolas</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Pitsos, Nicolas</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Iulian Bocai, « Filologii. Instituționalizarea studiului literar în Europa » [Philologies. L’institutionnalisation des études littéraires en Europe]: Bucarest, Editura Tracus Arte, 386 pages, 2020, en roumain</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Le volume que présente Iulian Bocai tente de répondre à une question vertigineuse : quel type de pensée est la pensée philologique ?]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14689</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14689</guid>
      <author>Bumbas, Alexandru</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Bumbas, Alexandru</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Une nouvelle nouvelle histoire de l’humanité. Une lecture de « Au commencement était… » de David Graeber et David Wengrow</title>
      <description><![CDATA[À la fois réaction à une sur-spécialisation des sciences humaines et sociales en général, et réponse à un désir du public, les grandes fresques de l'histoire humaine se sont multipliées ces dernières décennies. La parution en 2021 du livre « Au commencement, était… » de David Graeber et David Wengrow est venue s'ajouter à ces productions en prétendant déconstruire les grands récits existants et proposer une approche radicalement neuve des origines de nos sociétés.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14688</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14688</guid>
      <author>Lanfranchi, Thibaud</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Lanfranchi, Thibaud</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Indigenous languages: use and attitude in anglophone and francophone Cameroon</title>
      <description><![CDATA[It is a truism that colonialism had a terrible impact on African indigenous languages. In Cameroon, where more than 250 of languages are spoken, the situation is more complex, as the country was shared between French and British colonial powers. The system of governing implemented during the colonial era was different from one region to the other: whereas the British opted for an “Indirect rule” under which indigenous people were encouraged to govern themselves, while following to the letter the instructions given by British authorities, the French system was stricter, promoting assimilation. Under such conditions, personal as well as collective attachment to indigenous languages was significantly diminished especially in the Francophone part of the country. After independence was proclaimed in 1960, the two Cameroons reunified in 1961, having English and French as their official languages. However, even more than half a century later, the colonial wraith remains. Two surveys were carried out (2019 and 2020) among both young Anglophone and Francophone Cameroonians, on language use and language attitude. They reveal a clear dichotomy that reflects the colonial pattern. As a matter of fact, the surveys show a much greater attachment to indigenous languages among the Anglophones, which is evident in the vigorous upholding of indigenous languages in the family circle, whereas they are alarmingly giving way to the French language in Francophone homes. The results of the surveys are discussed in the light of the Social Identity Theory.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14687</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14687</guid>
      <author>Hodieb, Liliane</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Indigenous languages]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Language policy]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Language attitude]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Anglophone-Francophone dichotomy]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Cameroon]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Langues indigènes]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Colonisation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Attitude linguistique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Politique linguistique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Dichotomie francophone-anglophone]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Cameroun]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Hodieb, Liliane</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Indo-Pacific as a Subject of Study in International Relations: Comparative Readings of Scientific Production in the United States and China</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This article consists of a comparative analysis of social science production on the Indo-Pacific as an object of study, specifically in the field of International Relations (IR), between two countries: the United States and China, central players in this region. The aim is therefore to identify and define the main thematic orientations in the American and Chinese national academies over the last fifteen years, with scientific production on the Indo-Pacific understood as a political narrative. Thus, by using data from academic work in these two countries, focusing on IR articles, the aim is to highlight the scientific frame of reference of the “national traditions”. At the end of this article, it appears that the distinctions between these 'traditions' remain blurred, with different approaches running through them. The relationship between the scientific community and the political world can vary considerably depending on the contexts studied. However, while there are fundamental differences in the way researchers analyse cross-cutting challenges in the Indo-Pacific, a comparison of the scientific literature and expertise produced in universities in the United States and China sheds relevant light on the mutual influences of national academies of social sciences, specifically in International Relations.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14684</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14684</guid>
      <author>Mouton, Gauthier</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Indo-Pacific]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[occidentalism]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[political narrative]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[international relations]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[comparative analysis]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Indo-Pacífico]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[occidentalismo]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[narrativa política]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[relaciones internacionales]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[análisis comparativo]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Indo-Pacifique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[occidentalisme]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[récit politique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[relations internationales]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[analyse comparée]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Mouton, Gauthier</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A French experience – About FEI Xiaotong 费孝通 and the French publication of Xiangtu Zhongguo 乡土中国 (1948), under the title “The Roots of Chinese Society” (2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Fei Xiaotong (1910-2005) is considered in China as one of the founding fathers of Chinese anthropology and sociology. His most important theoretical work, Xiangtu Zhongguo 乡土中国, published in 1948, was translated into English and published in 1992 as From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. In 2021, to re-specify certain anthropological notions and put them within the reach of French-speaking readers, including in particular that of chaxu geju 差序格局 “(social) order based on status distinctions” which characterizes Chinese society according to the author, the work is published for the first time in French by Presses de l’Inalco under the title The Roots of Chinese Society.After a presentation of the author and his thinking anchored in the anthropological discipline, a reflection is proposed here on the academic debates between thinkers from different societies. A short biography of Fei Xiaotong precedes the exposition of the main concepts developed in his work, and the questions encountered regarding their translations. The old but complex links between Fei Xiaotong and French anthropology are then addressed, then his conceptions are compared to those of the French anthropologist Louis Dumont. The actual experience of publication and translation into French, involving Chinese and French collaborators, and the discussions about the preface written for this French edition are then recounted. A questioning concludes around the forms of censorship encountered in the human sciences in the light of different eras and distinct political horizons.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14686</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14686</guid>
      <author>Capdeville-Zeng, Catherine</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Fei Xiaotong]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[social anthropology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[translations in human sciences]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Fei Xiaotong]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Chine]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[anthropologie sociale]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[traductions en sciences humaines]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[censure]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Capdeville-Zeng, Catherine</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Building the Nation Through Social Science: The Rossiiskii Project and Its Protagonists</title>
      <description><![CDATA[This article examines the idea of the civic nation, known as rossiiskii project, and its intellectual roots in post-Soviet Russia. After exploring the intertwined careers of its leading theorists and promoters, the article analyzes the ways in which social science expertise has been deliberately placed at the service of a political cause, i.e., Russian nation-building. Finally, the article shows the lack of consensus around this project, as well as the reluctance of the Putin regime to impose it.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14683</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14683</guid>
      <author>Fediunin, Jules</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[contemporary Russia]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[civic nation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[nationalism rossiiskii]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[constructivism]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[nation-building]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[ethnic group]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[political sociology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[groupe ethnique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sociologie politique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Russie contemporaine]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[nation civique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[nationalisme russien]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[constructivisme]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[construction nationale]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Fediunin, Jules</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Déplacer le curseur de l’Histoire ? Une critique de « Au commencement était…, Une nouvelle histoire de l’humanité », par David Graeber et David Wengrow</title>
      <description><![CDATA[La nouvelle et volumineuse histoire de la liberté de Graeber et Wengrow possède des atouts considérables mais elle souffre également de graves lacunes.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14685</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14685</guid>
      <author>Scheidel, Walter</author>
      <author>Darmangeat, Christophe</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Scheidel, Walter</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Darmangeat, Christophe</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From the Modernization theory to the debate on Asian values: trajectory of alternative social sciences in Singapore (1970s-1990s)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Singapore offers an interesting puzzle for the study of differentialist science policies.How can we understand that the city-state, which had long adopted a modernising and universalist scientific stance, came to reverse this agenda in the 1970s, in order to promote an endogenous and particularist conception of the social sciences? This reversal, which saw Singapore oppose the Euro-American scientific establishment, is particularly counterintuitive as it occurred precisely when the island was completing its integration into the circuits of the Western capitalist economy. To understand this, the article proposes to analyse in detail the relations between Singaporean political and scientific circles, in order to identify the configurations in which the differentialist hypothesis gained credibility. In doing so, it shows both the multiplicity of actors and scales involved in this transformation,  as well as the still contested and unfinished nature of differential science policies.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14682</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14682</guid>
      <author>Brisson, Thomas</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[scientific differentialism]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[knowledge-power relations]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Asian values]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[globalisation of knowledge]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Singapour]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[différentialisme scientifique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[relations savoir-pouvoir]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[valeurs asiatiques]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[globalisation des savoirs]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Brisson, Thomas</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introduction : universelles, décentrées, différentialistes ? Les sciences sociales face au défi renouvelé de la contextualisation et de la politisation des savoirs</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Ce numéro de Sociétés plurielles est le produit d’un appel à contributions portant sur « Les sciences sociales, entre universalisme et différentialisme : un retour des “écoles nationales” ? ». La proposition invitait à interroger la résurgence, paradoxale, de la référence à des « écoles » ou « traditions » nationales au sein de disciplines conçues pour penser le pluralisme des sociétés et des cultures au prisme de paradigmes, de concepts ou de méthodes aspirant sinon à l’universalité, du moins à saisir le monde social en dépassant la description de situations particulières.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 14:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14681</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14681</guid>
      <author>Allès, Delphine</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[universalisme]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[différentialisme]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[savoir]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[pouvoir]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[épistémologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sciences sociales]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Allès, Delphine</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Archaeology in support of national identities: why is it necessary to destroy plaster casts of ancient art?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Following the example of Germany and after 1870s, plaster casts of ancient art are subject to a “cultural transfer” in France and in Italy. This kind of process reflects the birth of archaeology as a science; it is aligned to a specific change in higher education and it allows a nation building / re-building (by referring to Italian and French examples). In addition, the consolidating nation process is based on a cultural mechanism caused by globalization, i.e. “inventing tradition”. The “myth of white Greece” or that of “Romanity” can be taken into account in order to justify the destruction of plaster casts of ancient art.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11290</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11290</guid>
      <author>Avola, Irene</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[plaster casts]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[plaster cast gallery]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[pedagogical and scientific tool]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[ancient sculpture]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[archaeology of art]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[history of archaeology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[cultural transfer]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[inventing traditions]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[national identities]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[moulages]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[tirages en plâtre]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[gypsothèques]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[instrument pédagogique et scientifique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sculpture antique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[archéologie de l’art]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[histoire de l’archéologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[transfert culturel]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[invention de la tradition]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[identités nationales]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[calchi]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[riproduzioni in gesso]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[gipsoteche]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[strumento pedagogico e scientifico]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[scultura antica]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[archeologia dell’arte]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[storia dell’archeologia]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[transfert culturale]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[invenzione della tradizione]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[identità nazionali]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.ART]Humanities and Social Sciences/Art and art history]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.HIST]Humanities and Social Sciences/History]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Avola, Irene</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Socio-centric biases and constructions of otherness: For a critical and reasoned anthropological approach</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Considering the colonial heritage and the other forms of domination makes it necessary to take a critical approach to the positions of authority on which scientific discourse is based. What would be the conditions for the possibility of knowledge giving access to alternative forms of knowledge and discourse about the world? Does not every approach bring its own biases in the project of universal knowledge? The reflection is based on an ethnographic survey (Wallis) and the current debate on the restitution of African museum collections by former colonial countries.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11292</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11292</guid>
      <author>Chave-Dartoen, Sophie</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[otherness]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[positions of authority]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[indigenous epistemologies]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[scientific knowledge]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[epistemological biases]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[vernacular categories]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[restitution]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[antropología]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[alteridad]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[posiciones de autoridad]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[epistemologías indígenas]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[conocimiento científico]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[sesgos epistemológicos]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[categorías vernáculas]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[restituciones]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[anthropologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[altérité]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[positions d’autorité]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[épistémologies autochtones]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[savoir scientifique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[biais épistémologiques]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[catégories vernaculaires]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[restitutions]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Chave-Dartoen, Sophie</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From the exhibition in colonial exhibitions to the new Ainu National Museum: Is the voice of the indigenous impenetrable in the museum space?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[Has the inauguration of the first Ainu National Museum in Japan in 2020, which follows the recognition of their indigenous status in 2019, redefined the actors at play in discussing Ainu history? The study of this new museum will serve as a case study to analyse the elaboration of discourses defining Self and Other, as well as the relationship between those who produce knowledge about the Ainu and the Ainu themselves.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11291</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11291</guid>
      <author>Berthon, Alice</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Ainu]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Ainu studies]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[national museum]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[indigeneity]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[museum studies]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[postcolonialism]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[otherness]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[représentation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[museum exhibition]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Aïnou]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[études aïnoues]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[histoire des sciences]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[musée national]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[autochtonie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[muséographie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[muséologie]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[postcolonial]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[altérité]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[représentation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[exposition muséale]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Berthon, Alice</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Venus of Milo Japanese?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[The Venus of Milo is seen as a unique masterpiece of Greek art. However, to the great displeasure of the Greek authorities who are demanding its return, it has belonged to the French public collections since 1821. More generally, it is widely considered a European and Western heritage. And it goes without saying, its beauty is universal. But can it be Japanese? Through the examination of the reception of the Venus de Milo in Japan, the aim is to reflect on the conditions of a utopian appropriation of art works, given that, unlike texts that can be quoted, cut and mounted, paintings and statues are strongly dependant on their materiality. Against the current discourse on the dematerialization of art works, which goes hand in hand with an increasing fetishization of the originals, this article explores the path of an incorporation through practice and repetition.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11293</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11293</guid>
      <author>Lucken, Michael</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Venus de Milo]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[The Louvre Sculpture Museum]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Morimura Yasumasa]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[academic drawing]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[appropriation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[art democratization]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Vénus de Milo]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Japon]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Grèce]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[musée des sculptures du Louvre]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[Morimura Yasumasa]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[dessin académique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[appropriation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[démocratisation de l’art]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[ミロのヴィーナス]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[日本]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[ギリシャ]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[ルーブル彫刻美術館]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[森村泰昌]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[デッサン]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[アプロプリエーション]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[美術の民衆化]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.ART]Humanities and Social Sciences/Art and art history]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Lucken, Michael</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>French Polynesia: last bastion of the “invention of tradition”?: When the scientific field rejects cultural renaissances</title>
      <description><![CDATA[While the actors of cultural renaissances in French Polynesia do not hesitate to mobilize historical, archeological or anthropological research work as means of knowing the precolonial past, the scientific field, especially the French-speaking researchers, continue to overlook and discredit this cultural enunciation. The historicity of the practices and the aims pursued within the framework of these renaissances are thus questioned, revealing the still decisive influence of a theory that has nevertheless been undermined elsewhere in the Pacific: the invention of tradition.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11294</link>
      <guid>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11294</guid>
      <author>Mury, Florence</author>
      <category><![CDATA[Sociétés plurielles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[cultural enunciation]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[cultural renaissances]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[cultural geography]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[epistemic oppression]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[decolonial studies]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[epistemic hospitality]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[scientific authority]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[énonciation culturelle]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[renaissances culturelles]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[géographie culturelle]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[oppression épistémique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[études décoloniales]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[réception]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[hospitalité épistémique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[autorité scientifique]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology]]></category>
      <category><![CDATA[[SHS.HISPHILSO]Humanities and Social Sciences/History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences]]></category>
      <dc:creator>Mury, Florence</dc:creator>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
