<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title type="text">Sociétés plurielles</title>
  <subtitle type="text">Sociétés plurielles: latest publications</subtitle>
  <logo>https://societes-plurielles.episciences.org/logos/logo-societes-plurielles-small.svg</logo>
  <updated>2026-06-01T20:02:41+00:00</updated>
  <generator>Episciences</generator>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://societes-plurielles.episciences.org"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://api.episciences.org/api/feed/atom/societes-plurielles"/>
  <id>https://societes-plurielles.episciences.org</id>
  <author>
    <name>Sociétés plurielles</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/"/>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[When Words Tell Things: A Linguistic Archaeology of the Mother–Child Dyad]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This paper tests the hypothesis that certain sound–meaning patterns associated with “mother” and “breast” may reflect a very ancient codiffusion, inherited from the earliest migrations of Homo sapiens and from the centrality of the mother–infant dyad. Within a framework of “linguistic archaeology,” four phonotactic traits are examined across 2,959 languages (“mother”) and 7,322 languages (“breast”) from the Lexibank and ASJP databases: [n]/[ŋ] and [na]/[ŋa] in initial position for “mother,” and [mu] and [amu] for “breast.” Their distribution is assessed through spatial analyses (Moran’s I, binomial z-scores on 2°×2° grids, random permutations, great-circle distances). The results reveal a non-random structuring for [n]/[ŋ] and [mu], with hotspots in Africa, South Asia, Island Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and Australia, regions that align with the southern routes of early Homo sapiens dispersal. The forms [na] and [amu], more geographically restricted, appear as regional archaisms. The strong geographic co-occurrence between [n]/[na] and [mu], contrasting with the limited spread of [amu], suggests an ancient lexical core linking “mother” and “breast,” not reducible to articulatory biases alone. Without positing a single protolanguage, the study shows that linguistic areology can reveal fossil traces of an early cultural structuring around the mother–infant dyad, providing partial support for the hypothesis of an initial cultural unity disseminated during the first out-of-Africa dispersals of Homo sapiens.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:46:41+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:46:41+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17333"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17333</id>
    <author>
      <name>d'Huy, Julien</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="lexical diffusion" label="lexical diffusion"/>
    <category term="areology" label="areology"/>
    <category term="human migratory routes" label="human migratory routes"/>
    <category term="phonotactics" label="phonotactics"/>
    <category term="mother–infant dyad" label="mother–infant dyad"/>
    <category term="linguistic archaeology" label="linguistic archaeology"/>
    <category term="aréologie" label="aréologie"/>
    <category term="routes migratoires humaines" label="routes migratoires humaines"/>
    <category term="diffusion lexicale" label="diffusion lexicale"/>
    <category term="phonotactique" label="phonotactique"/>
    <category term="dyade mère-enfant" label="dyade mère-enfant"/>
    <category term="archéologie linguistique" label="archéologie linguistique"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[The contribution of social invariants to learning social work: an analysis of first-year students’ perceptions]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This research examines the place and function of sociological knowledge in social work training, particularly through the teaching of social invariants proposed by Bernard Lahire (2023). These concepts, which can shed light on the fundamental structures of society, are studied here in terms of their reception and perceived usefulness by first-year students in the bachelor’s degree program in social work at Hénallux (Namur, Belgium). The study adopts a mixed approach: a questionnaire administered to 77 students, analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests, is supplemented by eight interviews with students and two interviews with teachers, which are subjected to thematic analysis with a double coding cycle. The results highlight three major functions of invariants: (1) deciphering situations involving users, (2) a more complex understanding, and (3) capitalizing on solutions to address the vulnerabilities of the public. In addition, two specific advantages emerge from social invariants: their explanatory power as general concepts that can be used to elucidate social phenomena while promoting, through their contextual variation, a nuanced interpretation of situations encountered in social intervention, and the inter/transdisciplinary scope of invariants. While a minority of students remain skeptical of theoretical knowledge, the relational and pedagogical quality of teaching appears to be a decisive lever for appropriation. Despite some limitations mentioned, the study concludes that invariants are relevant as integrative tools, articulating sociological intelligibility, reflexivity, and professional intervention.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:46:32+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:46:32+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17334"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17334</id>
    <author>
      <name>Paglia, Vincent</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="educational relationship" label="educational relationship"/>
    <category term="social work" label="social work"/>
    <category term="fundamental structures of human societies" label="fundamental structures of human societies"/>
    <category term="social invariants" label="social invariants"/>
    <category term="relation pédagogique" label="relation pédagogique"/>
    <category term="travail social" label="travail social"/>
    <category term="structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines" label="structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines"/>
    <category term="invariants sociaux" label="invariants sociaux"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Exploring age hierarchies in living organisms: Adult dominance among primates]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This article proposes to extend the study of the “hierarchical succession law” proposed by sociologist Bernard Lahire beyond the human species to include non-human primates. It argues for the need to extend the investigation of the nomological architecture defined in Structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines (Fundamental Structures of Human Societies) to other animal species and suggests the use of an “inductive taxonomy” method to identify laws and invariants applicable at different taxonomic levels (species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, and kingdom). Based on a synthesis of the literature in primatology and ethology, this contribution shows that the current state of research suggests that this law of “hierarchical succession” and adult domination are trans-species invariants that apply to all species of the Hominidae family and possibly all those of the primate order (and even mammals). Future research could further explore 1) the study of age-related dominance between juveniles on the one hand and between adults on the other; 2) the distinction between dominance based on age and dominance based on seniority (in a given territory); and 3) the differences between adult dominance and dominance based on seniority (taking into account the dominance experienced by older individuals). Finally, future work on the cultural dimensions and forms of resistance of young primates against adult dominance is also necessary.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:46:29+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:46:29+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17329"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17329</id>
    <author>
      <name>Allegret, Gabriel</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="primatology" label="primatology"/>
    <category term="sociology" label="sociology"/>
    <category term="age hierarchy" label="age hierarchy"/>
    <category term="adultism" label="adultism"/>
    <category term="domination by seniority" label="domination by seniority"/>
    <category term="adult domination" label="adult domination"/>
    <category term="adultisme" label="adultisme"/>
    <category term="domination adulte" label="domination adulte"/>
    <category term="domination par l’antériorité" label="domination par l’antériorité"/>
    <category term="primatologie" label="primatologie"/>
    <category term="sociologie" label="sociologie"/>
    <category term="hiérarchie d’âge" label="hiérarchie d’âge"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Rubio Clémentine, 2022, L’enseignement du français en Palestine, d’après les archives diplomatiques du Consulat de France à Jérusalem: Éditions Lambert-Lucas, Paris, Limoges, 262 p.]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[...]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:46:22+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:46:22+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17335"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17335</id>
    <author>
      <name>Verdeil, Chantal</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Radler Dana & Toma Cristina-Alice (dir.), 2024, Panait Istrati. Arhiva de la Siguranță / Panaït Istrati. Archive de la Sigourantza (1922-1942): Ediție bilingvă / Édition bilingue, Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca, 616 p.]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[...]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:46:10+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:46:10+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17336"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17336</id>
    <author>
      <name>Crețulescu, Vladimir</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[The fundamental structures of prehistoric societies]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[In Les structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines, Bernard Lahire shows that two biological constraints– sexual procreation and prolonged altriciality–permanently shape human social organisations. They generate relationships of dependence and domination, complemented by social invariants (kinship, division of labour, age hierarchies, cultural transmission) that structure all societies while leaving room for significant cultural variation. For prehistory, this framework provides an essential tool: in the face of incomplete data, it enables us to narrow down our hypotheses and anchor our analyses in the continuities of life. The book also sheds light on the structural origins of male domination, without denying the ability of human societies to modulate or overcome its effects. By offering a “map” of social invariants, Lahire provides major theoretical support for prehistoric research.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:46:02+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:46:02+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17330"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17330</id>
    <author>
      <name>Augereau, Anne</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="social invariants" label="social invariants"/>
    <category term="cultural variations" label="cultural variations"/>
    <category term="male domination" label="male domination"/>
    <category term="prehistory" label="prehistory"/>
    <category term="biology" label="biology"/>
    <category term="biologie" label="biologie"/>
    <category term="préhistoire" label="préhistoire"/>
    <category term="domination masculine" label="domination masculine"/>
    <category term="invariants sociaux" label="invariants sociaux"/>
    <category term="variations culturelles" label="variations culturelles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Biology and humanities: An evolutionary biologist’s perspective on Bernard Lahire’s book]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Bernard Lahire’s book, Les Structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines (2023), is a magnificent plea for transdisciplinarity, an approach that I find absolutely essential to enable all sciences to continue to advance our understanding of the universe around us. That being said, I would like to share a few thoughts that came to mind while reading this magnificent work, in relation to my own approach to synthesis in the field of biology. The first thought I would like to address here is in support of the transdisciplinary approach adopted by Bernard Lahire. Next, I offer two thoughts on the importance of general interdisciplinary laws. My fourth thought follows on from the previous ones and concerns the necessity of developing a common vocabulary to promote synthesis between disciplines. Finally, I make the connection with an important topic in the humanities: the origin of inequalities, a subject that Bernard Lahire naturally addresses in his book. My ultimate goal is to remind readers how closely biology and the humanities are linked, in that they both deal with the understanding of living things, which leads them to share many concepts and principles.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:45:59+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:45:59+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17328"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17328</id>
    <author>
      <name>Danchin, Étienne</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="humanities" label="humanities"/>
    <category term="social inequalities" label="social inequalities"/>
    <category term="historical law" label="historical law"/>
    <category term="natural selection" label="natural selection"/>
    <category term="human societies" label="human societies"/>
    <category term="evolution" label="evolution"/>
    <category term="biology" label="biology"/>
    <category term="biologie" label="biologie"/>
    <category term="sciences humaines" label="sciences humaines"/>
    <category term="inégalités sociales" label="inégalités sociales"/>
    <category term="loi historique universelle" label="loi historique universelle"/>
    <category term="sélection naturelle" label="sélection naturelle"/>
    <category term="sociétés humaines" label="sociétés humaines"/>
    <category term="évolution" label="évolution"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Leaving the cave to better return to it: in search of invariants]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Bernard Lahire’s thinking is extremely motivating because it allows us to connect the social with the living, to identify “lines of force” and “laws” that permit the creation of a scientific language that transcends mere descriptions and protects us from general discourses too disconnected from reality. Is it possible to make a considerable leap forward in time and apply these ideas to periods without written records, about which we know practically nothing? This is a new path to explore, and we present here the first, undoubtedly still clumsy, strokes of the pruning knife.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:45:53+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:45:53+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17331"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17331</id>
    <author>
      <name>Pigeaud, Romain</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="decorated caves" label="decorated caves"/>
    <category term="epistemology" label="epistemology"/>
    <category term="lines of force" label="lines of force"/>
    <category term="laws" label="laws"/>
    <category term="Prehistory" label="Prehistory"/>
    <category term="grottes ornées" label="grottes ornées"/>
    <category term="épistémologie" label="épistémologie"/>
    <category term="lignes de force" label="lignes de force"/>
    <category term="lois" label="lois"/>
    <category term="préhistoire" label="préhistoire"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Ambiguïté du rire pour faire une société humaine]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This article explores the ambivalent social functions of laughter through an interdisciplinary approach combining sociology, ethology, anthropology, developmental psychology, and, to some extent, gender studies and technology. It analyzes the evolutionary, normative, critical, and cultural dimensions of human laughter. It thus shows that laughter constitutes a fundamental social practice – at once a vector of inclusion and sanction, and potentially of subversion and relational creativity.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:45:42+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:45:42+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17332"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17332</id>
    <author>
      <name>Date, Kiyonobu</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="interculturality" label="interculturality"/>
    <category term="posthumanity" label="posthumanity"/>
    <category term="gender" label="gender"/>
    <category term="inclusion" label="inclusion"/>
    <category term="social exclusion" label="social exclusion"/>
    <category term="Henri Bergson" label="Henri Bergson"/>
    <category term="sociology" label="sociology"/>
    <category term="evolution" label="evolution"/>
    <category term="smile" label="smile"/>
    <category term="laughter" label="laughter"/>
    <category term="child development" label="child development"/>
    <category term="exclusion sociale" label="exclusion sociale"/>
    <category term="inclusion" label="inclusion"/>
    <category term="Henri Bergson" label="Henri Bergson"/>
    <category term="sociologie" label="sociologie"/>
    <category term="développement de l’enfant" label="développement de l’enfant"/>
    <category term="évolution" label="évolution"/>
    <category term="sourire" label="sourire"/>
    <category term="rire" label="rire"/>
    <category term="genre" label="genre"/>
    <category term="interculturalité" label="interculturalité"/>
    <category term="posthumanité" label="posthumanité"/>
    <category term="ポストヒューマン" label="ポストヒューマン"/>
    <category term="間文化性" label="間文化性"/>
    <category term="ジェンダー" label="ジェンダー"/>
    <category term="包摂" label="包摂"/>
    <category term="社会的排除" label="社会的排除"/>
    <category term="アンリ・ベルクソン" label="アンリ・ベルクソン"/>
    <category term="社会学" label="社会学"/>
    <category term="子どもの発達" label="子どもの発達"/>
    <category term="進化" label="進化"/>
    <category term="微笑" label="微笑"/>
    <category term="笑い" label="笑い"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[General laws of evolution and internal laws of evolution within societies: A comparative reading of Bernard Lahire and Alain Testart]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[In his book Structures fondamentales des sociétés humaines (Fundamental Structures of Human Societies), Bernard Lahire returns to the original purpose of social sciences: discovering the laws that govern human societies. However, while the founders of social sciences sought above all to identify laws specific to a given type of society, Bernard Lahire prefers to focus on universally valid laws. This article examines the possibility of articulating these two research perspectives. It attempts to understand how the laws of internal evolution within societies relate to the general laws of evolution identified by Bernard Lahire. To this end, it compares the work of Bernard Lahire with that of Alain Testart, one of the most recent authors to have provided the most serious avenues for identifying laws specific to given societies. This dialogue shows that one of the keys to understanding the problem lies in the junction between the law of cumulative objectification (general law) and the laws of concentration of rights over men (which are specific to different types of society).]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:43:51+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:43:51+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17327"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17327</id>
    <author>
      <name>Aslanoff, Elie</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="accumulation" label="accumulation"/>
    <category term="wealth" label="wealth"/>
    <category term="laws" label="laws"/>
    <category term="evolutionism" label="evolutionism"/>
    <category term="Alain Testart" label="Alain Testart"/>
    <category term="Bernard Lahire" label="Bernard Lahire"/>
    <category term="évolutionnisme" label="évolutionnisme"/>
    <category term="Bernard Lahire" label="Bernard Lahire"/>
    <category term="Alain Testart" label="Alain Testart"/>
    <category term="accumulation" label="accumulation"/>
    <category term="richesses" label="richesses"/>
    <category term="lois" label="lois"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Matter, energy, humanity: Anthropology versus entropy]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This article builds on Bernard Lahire’s recent call to refound the social sciences within a unified framework that incorporates the life sciences. This unification is approached from the standpoint of anthropology, defined as a general science of the human species and necessarily grounded in the natural sciences that elucidate the biological, cognitive, and social emergence of Homo sapiens.Drawing on the physics of complex systems, the argument emphasizes that life, as an open system, counteracts entropy by developing complex structures capable of processing information for self-organization—of which human societies constitute the most sophisticated expression to date. The systematic articulation of three levels of reality—matter-energy, information, and reflexivity—demonstrates that human uniqueness stems less from an ontological rupture than from an extreme amplification of the informational capacities inherent in living systems, culminating in scientific reflexivity.Anthropology thus emerges as a pivotal discipline, capable of linking the study of complex social systems with a naturalistic understanding of life, and of providing a conceptual framework for analyzing the interdependencies between the biosphere and the anthroposphere.Bernard Lahire’s proposed “social science of life” gains additional conceptual grounding when viewed through this broader lens: the unification of the social and natural sciences is not merely a programmatic ambition but an existential necessity arising from humanity’s position within the matter-energy-information continuum.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:42:12+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:42:12+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17326"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17326</id>
    <author>
      <name>Lelong, Boris</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="Anthropology Against Entropy" label="Anthropology Against Entropy"/>
    <category term="Humanity" label="Humanity"/>
    <category term="Energy" label="Energy"/>
    <category term="Matter" label="Matter"/>
    <category term="l’anthropologie contre l’entropie" label="l’anthropologie contre l’entropie"/>
    <category term="humanité" label="humanité"/>
    <category term="énergie" label="énergie"/>
    <category term="matière" label="matière"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[On the Reversive Effect of Evolution: A Brief Response to Bernard Lahire]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The concept of the reversive effect of evolution, introduced by Patrick Tort into Darwinian studies in 1983, has profoundly unsettled a great many received ideas about Darwin and about his understanding of the civilizing process. In The Descent of Man (1871), Darwin explains with the utmost clarity that, in acting powerfully upon social instincts and rational capacities, natural selection selects civilization—an outcome that stands in opposition to the (now archaic) eliminatory dynamic of natural selection by seeking to transform the human environment into an aid to survival.]]></summary>
    <published>2026-01-16T15:41:11+00:00</published>
    <updated>2026-01-16T15:41:11+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17325"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2026.17325</id>
    <author>
      <name>Tort, Patrick</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="reversive effect of evolution" label="reversive effect of evolution"/>
    <category term="Wallace (Alfred Russel)" label="Wallace (Alfred Russel)"/>
    <category term="natural selection" label="natural selection"/>
    <category term="Darwin (Charles Robert)" label="Darwin (Charles Robert)"/>
    <category term="civilization" label="civilization"/>
    <category term="darwinian anthropology" label="darwinian anthropology"/>
    <category term="Wallace (Alfred Russel)" label="Wallace (Alfred Russel)"/>
    <category term="sélection naturelle" label="sélection naturelle"/>
    <category term="effet réversif de l’évolution" label="effet réversif de l’évolution"/>
    <category term="Darwin (Charles Robert)" label="Darwin (Charles Robert)"/>
    <category term="civilisation" label="civilisation"/>
    <category term="anthropologie darwinienne" label="anthropologie darwinienne"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Pecqueux Anthony, Poupin Perrine et Vuillerod Jean-Baptiste (coord.), « Tracés », hors-série no 22 : « L’interdisciplinarité “en effet” : sciences sociales, sciences naturelles﻿ »]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Ce numéro, structuré autour d'une introduction écrite par les coordinateurs du numéro, de cinq articles interdisciplinaires et de deux entretiens, propose une analyse riche et essentielle portant sur l'interdisciplinarité entre les sciences sociales et les sciences naturelles et la manière dont cette interdisciplinarité fait « face à la question écologique ».]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:47:11+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:47:11+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14693"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14693</id>
    <author>
      <name>Robert-Boeuf, Camille</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Badrinathan Vasumathi, Pejoska-Bouchereau Frosa, Racine Odile, Szende Thomas (dir.), « Médier entre langues, cultures et identités : enjeux, outils, stratégies. Mediating between languages, cultures, identities: challenges, tools, strategies »: Éditions des archives contemporaines (Coll. Plidam), 2022]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Cet ouvrage propose des approches riches et nuancées de la médiation interculturelle et linguistique. Il met en lumière le rôle fondamental des médiateurs dans notre monde de plus en plus divers et connecté.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:44:54+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:44:54+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14692"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14692</id>
    <author>
      <name>Mladenov, Olivera</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[William A. Ewing et Holly Roussel, « Civilization : Quelle époque ! », 2021]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Way We Live Now : tel est le sous-titre original de l’exposition Civilization qui a donné lieu à ce catalogue. L’objectif poursuivi est de rendre visibles les travers majeurs de notre civilisation et notamment l’incapacité de l’humanité à « appuyer sur le frein ».]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:42:53+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:42:53+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14691"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14691</id>
    <author>
      <name>Vartejanu-Joubert, Madalina</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Vladimir Crețulescu, « Ethnicité aroumaine, nationalité roumaine : la construction discursive d’une identité nationale (1770-1878) »: Paris, L’Harmattan, 2021]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Dans cet ouvrage, Vladimir Crețulescu s’attelle à étudier une des questions centrales du champ des études aroumaines, en rapport avec l’identité nationale des Aroumains.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:41:17+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:41:17+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14690"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14690</id>
    <author>
      <name>Pitsos, Nicolas</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Iulian Bocai, « Filologii. Instituționalizarea studiului literar în Europa » [Philologies. L’institutionnalisation des études littéraires en Europe]: Bucarest, Editura Tracus Arte, 386 pages, 2020, en roumain]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Le volume que présente Iulian Bocai tente de répondre à une question vertigineuse : quel type de pensée est la pensée philologique ?]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:39:48+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:39:48+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14689"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14689</id>
    <author>
      <name>Bumbas, Alexandru</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Une nouvelle nouvelle histoire de l’humanité. Une lecture de « Au commencement était… » de David Graeber et David Wengrow]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[À la fois réaction à une sur-spécialisation des sciences humaines et sociales en général, et réponse à un désir du public, les grandes fresques de l'histoire humaine se sont multipliées ces dernières décennies. La parution en 2021 du livre « Au commencement, était… » de David Graeber et David Wengrow est venue s'ajouter à ces productions en prétendant déconstruire les grands récits existants et proposer une approche radicalement neuve des origines de nos sociétés.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:37:30+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:37:30+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14688"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14688</id>
    <author>
      <name>Lanfranchi, Thibaud</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Indigenous languages: use and attitude in anglophone and francophone Cameroon]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[It is a truism that colonialism had a terrible impact on African indigenous languages. In Cameroon, where more than 250 of languages are spoken, the situation is more complex, as the country was shared between French and British colonial powers. The system of governing implemented during the colonial era was different from one region to the other: whereas the British opted for an “Indirect rule” under which indigenous people were encouraged to govern themselves, while following to the letter the instructions given by British authorities, the French system was stricter, promoting assimilation. Under such conditions, personal as well as collective attachment to indigenous languages was significantly diminished especially in the Francophone part of the country. After independence was proclaimed in 1960, the two Cameroons reunified in 1961, having English and French as their official languages. However, even more than half a century later, the colonial wraith remains. Two surveys were carried out (2019 and 2020) among both young Anglophone and Francophone Cameroonians, on language use and language attitude. They reveal a clear dichotomy that reflects the colonial pattern. As a matter of fact, the surveys show a much greater attachment to indigenous languages among the Anglophones, which is evident in the vigorous upholding of indigenous languages in the family circle, whereas they are alarmingly giving way to the French language in Francophone homes. The results of the surveys are discussed in the light of the Social Identity Theory.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:35:00+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:35:00+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14687"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14687</id>
    <author>
      <name>Hodieb, Liliane</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="Indigenous languages" label="Indigenous languages"/>
    <category term="Colonialism" label="Colonialism"/>
    <category term="Language policy" label="Language policy"/>
    <category term="Language attitude" label="Language attitude"/>
    <category term="Anglophone-Francophone dichotomy" label="Anglophone-Francophone dichotomy"/>
    <category term="Cameroon" label="Cameroon"/>
    <category term="Langues indigènes" label="Langues indigènes"/>
    <category term="Colonisation" label="Colonisation"/>
    <category term="Attitude linguistique" label="Attitude linguistique"/>
    <category term="Politique linguistique" label="Politique linguistique"/>
    <category term="Dichotomie francophone-anglophone" label="Dichotomie francophone-anglophone"/>
    <category term="Cameroun" label="Cameroun"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[The Indo-Pacific as a Subject of Study in International Relations: Comparative Readings of Scientific Production in the United States and China]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This article consists of a comparative analysis of social science production on the Indo-Pacific as an object of study, specifically in the field of International Relations (IR), between two countries: the United States and China, central players in this region. The aim is therefore to identify and define the main thematic orientations in the American and Chinese national academies over the last fifteen years, with scientific production on the Indo-Pacific understood as a political narrative. Thus, by using data from academic work in these two countries, focusing on IR articles, the aim is to highlight the scientific frame of reference of the “national traditions”. At the end of this article, it appears that the distinctions between these 'traditions' remain blurred, with different approaches running through them. The relationship between the scientific community and the political world can vary considerably depending on the contexts studied. However, while there are fundamental differences in the way researchers analyse cross-cutting challenges in the Indo-Pacific, a comparison of the scientific literature and expertise produced in universities in the United States and China sheds relevant light on the mutual influences of national academies of social sciences, specifically in International Relations.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:32:12+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:32:12+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14684"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14684</id>
    <author>
      <name>Mouton, Gauthier</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="Indo-Pacific" label="Indo-Pacific"/>
    <category term="occidentalism" label="occidentalism"/>
    <category term="political narrative" label="political narrative"/>
    <category term="international relations" label="international relations"/>
    <category term="comparative analysis" label="comparative analysis"/>
    <category term="Indo-Pacífico" label="Indo-Pacífico"/>
    <category term="occidentalismo" label="occidentalismo"/>
    <category term="narrativa política" label="narrativa política"/>
    <category term="relaciones internacionales" label="relaciones internacionales"/>
    <category term="análisis comparativo" label="análisis comparativo"/>
    <category term="Indo-Pacifique" label="Indo-Pacifique"/>
    <category term="occidentalisme" label="occidentalisme"/>
    <category term="récit politique" label="récit politique"/>
    <category term="relations internationales" label="relations internationales"/>
    <category term="analyse comparée" label="analyse comparée"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[A French experience – About FEI Xiaotong 费孝通 and the French publication of Xiangtu Zhongguo 乡土中国 (1948), under the title “The Roots of Chinese Society” (2021)]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Fei Xiaotong (1910-2005) is considered in China as one of the founding fathers of Chinese anthropology and sociology. His most important theoretical work, Xiangtu Zhongguo 乡土中国, published in 1948, was translated into English and published in 1992 as From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society. In 2021, to re-specify certain anthropological notions and put them within the reach of French-speaking readers, including in particular that of chaxu geju 差序格局 “(social) order based on status distinctions” which characterizes Chinese society according to the author, the work is published for the first time in French by Presses de l’Inalco under the title The Roots of Chinese Society.After a presentation of the author and his thinking anchored in the anthropological discipline, a reflection is proposed here on the academic debates between thinkers from different societies. A short biography of Fei Xiaotong precedes the exposition of the main concepts developed in his work, and the questions encountered regarding their translations. The old but complex links between Fei Xiaotong and French anthropology are then addressed, then his conceptions are compared to those of the French anthropologist Louis Dumont. The actual experience of publication and translation into French, involving Chinese and French collaborators, and the discussions about the preface written for this French edition are then recounted. A questioning concludes around the forms of censorship encountered in the human sciences in the light of different eras and distinct political horizons.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:30:27+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:30:27+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14686"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14686</id>
    <author>
      <name>Capdeville-Zeng, Catherine</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="Fei Xiaotong" label="Fei Xiaotong"/>
    <category term="China" label="China"/>
    <category term="social anthropology" label="social anthropology"/>
    <category term="translations in human sciences" label="translations in human sciences"/>
    <category term="censorship" label="censorship"/>
    <category term="Fei Xiaotong" label="Fei Xiaotong"/>
    <category term="Chine" label="Chine"/>
    <category term="anthropologie sociale" label="anthropologie sociale"/>
    <category term="traductions en sciences humaines" label="traductions en sciences humaines"/>
    <category term="censure" label="censure"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Building the Nation Through Social Science: The Rossiiskii Project and Its Protagonists]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[This article examines the idea of the civic nation, known as rossiiskii project, and its intellectual roots in post-Soviet Russia. After exploring the intertwined careers of its leading theorists and promoters, the article analyzes the ways in which social science expertise has been deliberately placed at the service of a political cause, i.e., Russian nation-building. Finally, the article shows the lack of consensus around this project, as well as the reluctance of the Putin regime to impose it.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:26:33+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:26:33+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14683"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14683</id>
    <author>
      <name>Fediunin, Jules</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="contemporary Russia" label="contemporary Russia"/>
    <category term="civic nation" label="civic nation"/>
    <category term="nationalism rossiiskii" label="nationalism rossiiskii"/>
    <category term="constructivism" label="constructivism"/>
    <category term="nation-building" label="nation-building"/>
    <category term="ethnic group" label="ethnic group"/>
    <category term="political sociology" label="political sociology"/>
    <category term="groupe ethnique" label="groupe ethnique"/>
    <category term="sociologie politique" label="sociologie politique"/>
    <category term="Russie contemporaine" label="Russie contemporaine"/>
    <category term="nation civique" label="nation civique"/>
    <category term="nationalisme russien" label="nationalisme russien"/>
    <category term="constructivisme" label="constructivisme"/>
    <category term="construction nationale" label="construction nationale"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Déplacer le curseur de l’Histoire ? Une critique de « Au commencement était…, Une nouvelle histoire de l’humanité », par David Graeber et David Wengrow]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[La nouvelle et volumineuse histoire de la liberté de Graeber et Wengrow possède des atouts considérables mais elle souffre également de graves lacunes.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:24:35+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:24:35+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14685"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14685</id>
    <author>
      <name>Scheidel, Walter</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Darmangeat, Christophe</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[From the Modernization theory to the debate on Asian values: trajectory of alternative social sciences in Singapore (1970s-1990s)]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Singapore offers an interesting puzzle for the study of differentialist science policies.How can we understand that the city-state, which had long adopted a modernising and universalist scientific stance, came to reverse this agenda in the 1970s, in order to promote an endogenous and particularist conception of the social sciences? This reversal, which saw Singapore oppose the Euro-American scientific establishment, is particularly counterintuitive as it occurred precisely when the island was completing its integration into the circuits of the Western capitalist economy. To understand this, the article proposes to analyse in detail the relations between Singaporean political and scientific circles, in order to identify the configurations in which the differentialist hypothesis gained credibility. In doing so, it shows both the multiplicity of actors and scales involved in this transformation,  as well as the still contested and unfinished nature of differential science policies.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T15:00:35+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T15:00:35+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14682"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14682</id>
    <author>
      <name>Brisson, Thomas</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="Singapore" label="Singapore"/>
    <category term="scientific differentialism" label="scientific differentialism"/>
    <category term="knowledge-power relations" label="knowledge-power relations"/>
    <category term="Asian values" label="Asian values"/>
    <category term="globalisation of knowledge" label="globalisation of knowledge"/>
    <category term="Singapour" label="Singapour"/>
    <category term="différentialisme scientifique" label="différentialisme scientifique"/>
    <category term="relations savoir-pouvoir" label="relations savoir-pouvoir"/>
    <category term="valeurs asiatiques" label="valeurs asiatiques"/>
    <category term="globalisation des savoirs" label="globalisation des savoirs"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Introduction : universelles, décentrées, différentialistes ? Les sciences sociales face au défi renouvelé de la contextualisation et de la politisation des savoirs]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Ce numéro de Sociétés plurielles est le produit d’un appel à contributions portant sur « Les sciences sociales, entre universalisme et différentialisme : un retour des “écoles nationales” ? ». La proposition invitait à interroger la résurgence, paradoxale, de la référence à des « écoles » ou « traditions » nationales au sein de disciplines conçues pour penser le pluralisme des sociétés et des cultures au prisme de paradigmes, de concepts ou de méthodes aspirant sinon à l’universalité, du moins à saisir le monde social en dépassant la description de situations particulières.]]></summary>
    <published>2024-11-06T14:48:32+00:00</published>
    <updated>2024-11-06T14:48:32+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14681"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2024.14681</id>
    <author>
      <name>Allès, Delphine</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="universalisme" label="universalisme"/>
    <category term="différentialisme" label="différentialisme"/>
    <category term="savoir" label="savoir"/>
    <category term="pouvoir" label="pouvoir"/>
    <category term="épistémologie" label="épistémologie"/>
    <category term="sciences sociales" label="sciences sociales"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Archaeology in support of national identities: why is it necessary to destroy plaster casts of ancient art?]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Following the example of Germany and after 1870s, plaster casts of ancient art are subject to a “cultural transfer” in France and in Italy. This kind of process reflects the birth of archaeology as a science; it is aligned to a specific change in higher education and it allows a nation building / re-building (by referring to Italian and French examples). In addition, the consolidating nation process is based on a cultural mechanism caused by globalization, i.e. “inventing tradition”. The “myth of white Greece” or that of “Romanity” can be taken into account in order to justify the destruction of plaster casts of ancient art.]]></summary>
    <published>2023-05-10T11:09:24+00:00</published>
    <updated>2023-05-10T11:09:24+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11290"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11290</id>
    <author>
      <name>Avola, Irene</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="plaster casts" label="plaster casts"/>
    <category term="plaster cast gallery" label="plaster cast gallery"/>
    <category term="pedagogical and scientific tool" label="pedagogical and scientific tool"/>
    <category term="ancient sculpture" label="ancient sculpture"/>
    <category term="archaeology of art" label="archaeology of art"/>
    <category term="history of archaeology" label="history of archaeology"/>
    <category term="cultural transfer" label="cultural transfer"/>
    <category term="inventing traditions" label="inventing traditions"/>
    <category term="national identities" label="national identities"/>
    <category term="moulages" label="moulages"/>
    <category term="tirages en plâtre" label="tirages en plâtre"/>
    <category term="gypsothèques" label="gypsothèques"/>
    <category term="instrument pédagogique et scientifique" label="instrument pédagogique et scientifique"/>
    <category term="sculpture antique" label="sculpture antique"/>
    <category term="archéologie de l’art" label="archéologie de l’art"/>
    <category term="histoire de l’archéologie" label="histoire de l’archéologie"/>
    <category term="transfert culturel" label="transfert culturel"/>
    <category term="invention de la tradition" label="invention de la tradition"/>
    <category term="identités nationales" label="identités nationales"/>
    <category term="calchi" label="calchi"/>
    <category term="riproduzioni in gesso" label="riproduzioni in gesso"/>
    <category term="gipsoteche" label="gipsoteche"/>
    <category term="strumento pedagogico e scientifico" label="strumento pedagogico e scientifico"/>
    <category term="scultura antica" label="scultura antica"/>
    <category term="archeologia dell’arte" label="archeologia dell’arte"/>
    <category term="storia dell’archeologia" label="storia dell’archeologia"/>
    <category term="transfert culturale" label="transfert culturale"/>
    <category term="invenzione della tradizione" label="invenzione della tradizione"/>
    <category term="identità nazionali" label="identità nazionali"/>
    <category term="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology" label="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology"/>
    <category term="[SHS.ART]Humanities and Social Sciences/Art and art history" label="[SHS.ART]Humanities and Social Sciences/Art and art history"/>
    <category term="[SHS.HIST]Humanities and Social Sciences/History" label="[SHS.HIST]Humanities and Social Sciences/History"/>
    <category term="[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology" label="[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Socio-centric biases and constructions of otherness: For a critical and reasoned anthropological approach]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Considering the colonial heritage and the other forms of domination makes it necessary to take a critical approach to the positions of authority on which scientific discourse is based. What would be the conditions for the possibility of knowledge giving access to alternative forms of knowledge and discourse about the world? Does not every approach bring its own biases in the project of universal knowledge? The reflection is based on an ethnographic survey (Wallis) and the current debate on the restitution of African museum collections by former colonial countries.]]></summary>
    <published>2023-05-10T11:09:18+00:00</published>
    <updated>2023-05-10T11:09:18+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11292"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11292</id>
    <author>
      <name>Chave-Dartoen, Sophie</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="anthropology" label="anthropology"/>
    <category term="otherness" label="otherness"/>
    <category term="positions of authority" label="positions of authority"/>
    <category term="indigenous epistemologies" label="indigenous epistemologies"/>
    <category term="scientific knowledge" label="scientific knowledge"/>
    <category term="epistemological biases" label="epistemological biases"/>
    <category term="vernacular categories" label="vernacular categories"/>
    <category term="restitution" label="restitution"/>
    <category term="antropología" label="antropología"/>
    <category term="alteridad" label="alteridad"/>
    <category term="posiciones de autoridad" label="posiciones de autoridad"/>
    <category term="epistemologías indígenas" label="epistemologías indígenas"/>
    <category term="conocimiento científico" label="conocimiento científico"/>
    <category term="sesgos epistemológicos" label="sesgos epistemológicos"/>
    <category term="categorías vernáculas" label="categorías vernáculas"/>
    <category term="restituciones" label="restituciones"/>
    <category term="anthropologie" label="anthropologie"/>
    <category term="altérité" label="altérité"/>
    <category term="positions d’autorité" label="positions d’autorité"/>
    <category term="épistémologies autochtones" label="épistémologies autochtones"/>
    <category term="savoir scientifique" label="savoir scientifique"/>
    <category term="biais épistémologiques" label="biais épistémologiques"/>
    <category term="catégories vernaculaires" label="catégories vernaculaires"/>
    <category term="restitutions" label="restitutions"/>
    <category term="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology" label="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[From the exhibition in colonial exhibitions to the new Ainu National Museum: Is the voice of the indigenous impenetrable in the museum space?]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Has the inauguration of the first Ainu National Museum in Japan in 2020, which follows the recognition of their indigenous status in 2019, redefined the actors at play in discussing Ainu history? The study of this new museum will serve as a case study to analyse the elaboration of discourses defining Self and Other, as well as the relationship between those who produce knowledge about the Ainu and the Ainu themselves.]]></summary>
    <published>2023-05-10T11:09:13+00:00</published>
    <updated>2023-05-10T11:09:13+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11291"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11291</id>
    <author>
      <name>Berthon, Alice</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="Ainu" label="Ainu"/>
    <category term="Ainu studies" label="Ainu studies"/>
    <category term="history of science" label="history of science"/>
    <category term="national museum" label="national museum"/>
    <category term="indigeneity" label="indigeneity"/>
    <category term="museum studies" label="museum studies"/>
    <category term="postcolonialism" label="postcolonialism"/>
    <category term="otherness" label="otherness"/>
    <category term="représentation" label="représentation"/>
    <category term="museum exhibition" label="museum exhibition"/>
    <category term="Aïnou" label="Aïnou"/>
    <category term="études aïnoues" label="études aïnoues"/>
    <category term="histoire des sciences" label="histoire des sciences"/>
    <category term="musée national" label="musée national"/>
    <category term="autochtonie" label="autochtonie"/>
    <category term="muséographie" label="muséographie"/>
    <category term="muséologie" label="muséologie"/>
    <category term="postcolonial" label="postcolonial"/>
    <category term="altérité" label="altérité"/>
    <category term="représentation" label="représentation"/>
    <category term="exposition muséale" label="exposition muséale"/>
    <category term="[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology" label="[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology"/>
    <category term="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology" label="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Is the Venus of Milo Japanese?]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Venus of Milo is seen as a unique masterpiece of Greek art. However, to the great displeasure of the Greek authorities who are demanding its return, it has belonged to the French public collections since 1821. More generally, it is widely considered a European and Western heritage. And it goes without saying, its beauty is universal. But can it be Japanese? Through the examination of the reception of the Venus de Milo in Japan, the aim is to reflect on the conditions of a utopian appropriation of art works, given that, unlike texts that can be quoted, cut and mounted, paintings and statues are strongly dependant on their materiality. Against the current discourse on the dematerialization of art works, which goes hand in hand with an increasing fetishization of the originals, this article explores the path of an incorporation through practice and repetition.]]></summary>
    <published>2023-05-10T11:09:02+00:00</published>
    <updated>2023-05-10T11:09:02+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11293"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11293</id>
    <author>
      <name>Lucken, Michael</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="Venus de Milo" label="Venus de Milo"/>
    <category term="Japan" label="Japan"/>
    <category term="Greece" label="Greece"/>
    <category term="The Louvre Sculpture Museum" label="The Louvre Sculpture Museum"/>
    <category term="Morimura Yasumasa" label="Morimura Yasumasa"/>
    <category term="academic drawing" label="academic drawing"/>
    <category term="appropriation" label="appropriation"/>
    <category term="art democratization" label="art democratization"/>
    <category term="Vénus de Milo" label="Vénus de Milo"/>
    <category term="Japon" label="Japon"/>
    <category term="Grèce" label="Grèce"/>
    <category term="musée des sculptures du Louvre" label="musée des sculptures du Louvre"/>
    <category term="Morimura Yasumasa" label="Morimura Yasumasa"/>
    <category term="dessin académique" label="dessin académique"/>
    <category term="appropriation" label="appropriation"/>
    <category term="démocratisation de l’art" label="démocratisation de l’art"/>
    <category term="ミロのヴィーナス" label="ミロのヴィーナス"/>
    <category term="日本" label="日本"/>
    <category term="ギリシャ" label="ギリシャ"/>
    <category term="ルーブル彫刻美術館" label="ルーブル彫刻美術館"/>
    <category term="森村泰昌" label="森村泰昌"/>
    <category term="デッサン" label="デッサン"/>
    <category term="アプロプリエーション" label="アプロプリエーション"/>
    <category term="美術の民衆化" label="美術の民衆化"/>
    <category term="[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology" label="[SHS.MUSEO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Cultural heritage and museology"/>
    <category term="[SHS.ART]Humanities and Social Sciences/Art and art history" label="[SHS.ART]Humanities and Social Sciences/Art and art history"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[French Polynesia: last bastion of the “invention of tradition”?: When the scientific field rejects cultural renaissances]]></title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[While the actors of cultural renaissances in French Polynesia do not hesitate to mobilize historical, archeological or anthropological research work as means of knowing the precolonial past, the scientific field, especially the French-speaking researchers, continue to overlook and discredit this cultural enunciation. The historicity of the practices and the aims pursued within the framework of these renaissances are thus questioned, revealing the still decisive influence of a theory that has nevertheless been undermined elsewhere in the Pacific: the invention of tradition.]]></summary>
    <published>2023-05-10T11:08:58+00:00</published>
    <updated>2023-05-10T11:08:58+00:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11294"/>
    <id>https://doi.org/10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11294</id>
    <author>
      <name>Mury, Florence</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sociétés plurielles" label="Sociétés plurielles"/>
    <category term="cultural enunciation" label="cultural enunciation"/>
    <category term="cultural renaissances" label="cultural renaissances"/>
    <category term="cultural geography" label="cultural geography"/>
    <category term="epistemic oppression" label="epistemic oppression"/>
    <category term="decolonial studies" label="decolonial studies"/>
    <category term="epistemic hospitality" label="epistemic hospitality"/>
    <category term="scientific authority" label="scientific authority"/>
    <category term="énonciation culturelle" label="énonciation culturelle"/>
    <category term="renaissances culturelles" label="renaissances culturelles"/>
    <category term="géographie culturelle" label="géographie culturelle"/>
    <category term="oppression épistémique" label="oppression épistémique"/>
    <category term="études décoloniales" label="études décoloniales"/>
    <category term="réception" label="réception"/>
    <category term="hospitalité épistémique" label="hospitalité épistémique"/>
    <category term="autorité scientifique" label="autorité scientifique"/>
    <category term="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences" label="[SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences"/>
    <category term="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology" label="[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology"/>
    <category term="[SHS.HISPHILSO]Humanities and Social Sciences/History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences" label="[SHS.HISPHILSO]Humanities and Social Sciences/History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
