<doi_batch xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/5.3.1 https://www.crossref.org/schemas/crossref5.3.1.xsd" version="5.3.1"><head><doi_batch_id>episciences.org_11296_20260518220933583</doi_batch_id><timestamp>20260518220933583</timestamp><depositor><depositor_name>episciences.org</depositor_name><email_address>raphael.tournoy+crossrefapi@ccsd.cnrs.fr</email_address></depositor><registrant>episciences.org</registrant></head><body><journal><journal_metadata language="en"><full_title>Sociétés plurielles</full_title><issn media_type="electronic">2557-9959</issn></journal_metadata><journal_issue><publication_date media_type="online"><month>05</month><day>10</day><year>2023</year></publication_date><journal_volume><volume>Identity versus science?...</volume></journal_volume><issue>Articles</issue></journal_issue><journal_article publication_type="full_text" language="fr"><titles><title>Agriculteurs ou chasseurs-cueilleurs ? Le débat autour de Dark Emu</title></titles><contributors><person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Peter</given_name><surname>Sutton</surname></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Keryn</given_name><surname>Walshe</surname></person_name><person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author"><given_name>Christophe</given_name><surname>Darmangeat</surname><affiliations><institution><institution_name>Laboratoire Dynamiques Sociales et Recomposition des Espaces</institution_name><institution_id type="ror">https://ror.org/045r56524</institution_id></institution><institution><institution_name>Travaux et recherches archéologiques sur les cultures, les espaces et les sociétés</institution_name><institution_id type="ror">https://ror.org/04pfm5x27</institution_id><institution_acronym>TRACES</institution_acronym></institution></affiliations><ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9666-5204</ORCID></person_name></contributors><jats:abstract><jats:p>Pour une publication sur Épisciences.</jats:p><jats:p xml:lang="en">Dark Emu (2014), a book written by Bruce Pascoe, argues for a drastic revision of the vision of Aboriginal peoples at the time of the colonisation of Australia. Traditionally presented as nomadic hunter-gatherers, they were in fact for the most part villagers who applied some forms of agriculture and fish farming, all of which were concealed by those who wanted to appropriate their lands, thus forging a false version perpetuated by anthropological tradition. This provocative thesis has had a huge impact in Australia, where it has been the subject of much controversy. Peter Sutton and Keryn Walshe’s book is the first rebuttal by academic specialists–who are also deeply involved in the defence of the rights of Aboriginal communities.</jats:p><jats:p xml:lang="fr">Le livre Dark Emu (2014), écrit par Bruce Pascoe, plaide pour une révision drastique de la vision des peuples aborigènes au moment de la colonisation de l’Australie. Traditionnellement présentés comme des chasseurs-cueilleurs nomades, ceux-ci auraient en réalité été pour une bonne part des villageois pratiquant certaines formes d’agriculture et de pisciculture, autant d’éléments dissimulés par ceux qui voulaient s’approprier leurs terres, forgeant ainsi une version mensongère perpétuée par la tradition anthropologique. Cette thèse provocatrice a connu un immense retentissement en Australie, où elle a suscité de très âpres polémiques. Le livre de Peter Sutton et Keryn Walshe en constitue la première réfutation émanant de spécialistes académiques –  par ailleurs, profondément impliqués dans la défense des droits des communautés aborigènes.</jats:p></jats:abstract><publication_date media_type="online"><month>05</month><day>10</day><year>2023</year></publication_date><acceptance_date media_type="online"><month>05</month><day>10</day><year>2023</year></acceptance_date><publisher_item><item_number item_number_type="article_number">11296</item_number></publisher_item><program xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/AccessIndicators.xsd" name="AccessIndicators"><free_to_read start_date="2023-05-10"/><license_ref applies_to="am" start_date="2023-05-10">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</license_ref><license_ref applies_to="vor" start_date="2023-05-10">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</license_ref><license_ref applies_to="tdm" start_date="2023-05-10">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</license_ref></program><program xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/relations.xsd"><related_item><intra_work_relation identifier-type="uri" relationship-type="isSameAs">https://hal.science/hal-04080821v1</intra_work_relation></related_item></program><doi_data><doi>10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11296</doi><resource>http://societes-plurielles.episciences.org/11296</resource><collection property="crawler-based"><item crawler="iParadigms"><resource>https://hal.science/hal-04080821v1/document</resource></item></collection><collection property="text-mining"><item><resource mime_type="application/pdf">https://hal.science/hal-04080821v1/document</resource></item></collection></doi_data></journal_article></journal></body></doi_batch>