<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="fr"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">episciences.org</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="issn" specific-use="electronic">2557-9959</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Sociétés plurielles</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>SOCIETES-PLURIELLES</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn specific-use="electronic">2557-9959</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Presses de l’Inalco</publisher-name><publisher-loc>                                            Paris, France                                        <email>support@episciences.org</email>                    <uri>https://www.episciences.org</uri>                    <uri>https://societes-plurielles.episciences.org</uri>                </publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46298/societes-plurielles.2023.11297</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="hal">hal-04080834</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">http://societes-plurielles.episciences.org/11297</article-id><article-catgories><series-text content-type="text">Articles</series-text></article-catgories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">“Here come the anthropos”: what is an archeologist for ?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="fr"><trans-title>« Voilà les anthropos » : à quoi sert un archéologue ?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Whittaker</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Darmangeat</surname><given-names>Christophe</given-names></name><institution-wrap><institution><institution_id type="ror">https://ror.org/05f82e368</institution_id><institution_name>Université Paris Cité</institution_name></institution><institution><institution_id type="ror">https://ror.org/045r56524</institution_id><institution_name>Laboratoire Dynamiques Sociales et Recomposition des Espaces</institution_name></institution></institution-wrap></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>Identity versus science? Science at the service of identity?</volume><uri specific-use="for-review">http://societes-plurielles.episciences.org/11297/pdf</uri><self-uri>http://societes-plurielles.episciences.org/11297</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="fr"><p>Pour une publication sur Épisciences.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="fr"><p>Whittaker John, 1997, “Here Come the Anthros. What Good is an Archaeologist?” in Andelson Jon (dir.), Anthropology Matters: Essays in Honor of Ralph A. Luebben, Grinnell College, Grinnell, p. 101-108.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Starting with a song denouncing anthropologists and prehistorians as disrespectful of the cultures they study, the article reflects on the relationship between lost cultures and their scientific study, drawing on the author’s personal experience. It then examines NAGPRA, the federal “Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act”, which in 1990 gave Native American communities extensive rights over various cultural properties and archaeological sites. He highlights the paradoxical, if not perverse, effects of such legislation, which has not necessarily contributed to a better knowledge (and recognition) of pre-colonial societies in North America.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="fr"><p>À partir d’une chanson dénonçant les anthropologues et des préhistoriens comme irrespectueux des cultures qu’ils étudient, l’article propose une réflexion sur le rapport entre les cultures disparues et leur étude scientifique inspirée de l’expérience personnelle de l’auteur. Il examine ensuite le NAGPRA, loi fédérale sur « la protection et le rapatriement des tombes des natifs américains » qui, en 1990, a conféré aux communautés amérindiennes des droits étendus sur divers biens culturels et sites archéologiques. Il souligne notamment les effets paradoxaux, sinon pervers, d’un tel dispositif législatif, qui n’a pas forcément contribué à une meilleure connaissance (et reconnaissance) des sociétés précoloniales d’Amérique du Nord.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author" xml:lang="fr"><kwd>North America</kwd><kwd>NAGPRA</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>archaeology</kwd><kwd>universalism</kwd><kwd>Sinagua</kwd><kwd>Amérique du Nord</kwd><kwd>NAGPRA</kwd><kwd>culture</kwd><kwd>archéologie</kwd><kwd>universalisme</kwd><kwd>Sinagua</kwd><kwd>[SHS.ANTHRO-SE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Social Anthropology and ethnology</kwd><kwd>[SHS.HISPHILSO]Humanities and Social Sciences/History, Philosophy and Sociology of Sciences</kwd></kwd-group><permissions><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder>The Author(s)</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0"/></permissions><counts><page-count count="15"/></counts></article-meta></front><body/></article>